One job beats “general helper”
Narrow bots are easier to instruct, evaluate and repair when they drift. Use a coordinator only as a front door.
Independent community index
Give every bot
one clear job.
Explore 352 Grok Bot setups gathered from native shares, GitHub and Reddit. Compare what is included before adding anything.
352templates
6categories
8source sets
Review first Community popularity is useful context, never a safety guarantee.
01 / DIRECTORY
Find your next teammate
Search by job, integration or creator. Open every card to inspect the setup and original source first.
02 / FIELD NOTES
Patterns that survived the hype
These are synthesis notes, not product promises. Community reports are useful signals, but they remain anecdotal.
Dry run before routine
Test one representative task, inspect sources and correct the output before giving it a schedule.
Approval is part of the design
Messages, purchases, publishing, production changes and financial actions should stop for an explicit human decision.
Autonomy still has a cost
Long running and multi agent jobs can consume limits quickly. Start with the smallest useful cadence and expand from evidence.
03 / PROVENANCE
Follow the evidence
Every listing is traceable. Official claims and community experiments are intentionally kept separate.
01
Official Grok BotProduct capabilities and official role examples
02Native Grok Bot sharesLive share links with setup contents and creator sources
03Community share indexIndependent reachability checks for public Grok Bot shares
04Awesome Grok Bot182 community templates with creators and integrations
05Grok Bot research notesShare link behavior, ecosystem counts and operating patterns
06Reddit: four brief workflowAnecdotal field usage and single purpose bot pattern
07Reddit: chief of staff promptCommunity prompt pattern for inbox and meeting follow up
08Reddit: practical limitsMixed field reports on reliability, cost and operational risk